Unlike yesterday’s example, where Google was just deciding for itself which version of alternative, correct spellings you meant, I approve of this – partly because it’s helpful, and partly because the user retains control (so they can search for wrong spellings if they want to).
Here are some examples – plus some where it ought to be fixing them but isn’t. Note in each that the list of suggestions include the correct spellings (apart from millennium), even though I have spelled the word wrong.
Correcting common mis-spellings
Weird vs wierd
You type wierd, Google shows suggestions for weird
Acomodate vs accommodate
You type acomodate, Google shows suggestions for accommodate
Acceptable vs acceptible
You type acomodate, Google shows suggestions for accommodate
Acceptable vs acceptible
You type acceptible, Google shows suggestions for acceptable
Greatful vs grateful
You type greatful, Google shows suggestions for grateful
Bellwether vs bellweather
You type bellweather, Google shows suggestions for bellwether
Please get these right however
There is no such construction as “could of”. Please correct to could have.
Millennium – huh?
And millennium has two ls and two ns, however many results you’ve found for the wrong spelling …
Right, I think it just can’t spell millennium.
Conclusion
Looking at these, and the various other spelling examples that have emerged lately, it seems that Google must be using user behaviour in some way to deal with spelling errors.
For instance, where it observes people search for X immediately after Y (and X is a spelling variant of Y), it might decide to return X results when people search for Y. This probably explains the stationary / stationery issue from yesterday and the weird / wierd etc examples above.
Alternatively, it might be using its “did you mean” spelling correction data and, where people clicked this a lot, it’s now just assuming they meant it all along.
I’m not sure it explains Google returning results for optimization when you search for optimisation, but there you go.
What do you think?
You might also like
- Google’s spelling problems are worse than we thought
- Google adds remove option to Google Autocomplete
- Don’t believe Google Autocomplete when it comes to scams
- Google: We spell it colouring here
- Steven Gerrard: Google autocomplete finishes off The Sun’s work
Leave a comment!
